BBChap11

What was the matter with the master-at-arms? And, be the matter what it might, how could it have direct relation to Billy Budd with whom prior to the affair of the spilled soup he had never come into any special contact official or otherwise? What indeed could the trouble have to do with one so little inclined to give offense as the merchant-ship's peacemaker , even him who in Claggart's own phrase was "the sweet and pleasant youngfellow? Yes, why should Jemmy Legs , to borrow the Dansker's expression, be down on the Handsome Sailor? But, at heart and not for nothing, as the late chance encounter may indicate to the discerning , down on him, secretly down on him , he assuredly was. Now to invent something touching the more private career of Claggart, something involving Billy Budd, of which something the latter should be wholly ignorant, some romantic incident implyingthat Claggart's knowledge of the young blue-jacket began at some period anterior to catching sight of him on board the seventy-four— all this , not so difficult to do, might avail in a way more or less interesting to account for whatever of enigma may appear to lurk in the case. But in fact there was nothing of the sort. And yet the cause, necessarily to be assumed as the sole one assignable, is in its very realism as much charged with that prime element of Radclifian romance, the mysterious , as any that the ingenuity of the author of the Mysteries of Udolpho could devise . For what can more partake of the mysterious than an antipathy spontanious and profound such as is evoked in certain exceptional mortals by the mere aspect of some other mortal, however harmless he may be? if not called forth by this very harmlessness itself. Now there can exist no irritating juxtaposition of dissimilar personalities comparable to that which is possible abord a great war-ship fully manned and at sea.There, every day among all ranks almost every man comes into more or less of contact with almost every other man. Wholly there to avoid even the sight of an aggravating object one must needs give it Jonah's toss or jump overboard himself. Imagine how all this might eventually operate on some peculiar human creature the direct reverse of a saint? But for the adequate comprehending of Claggart by a normal nature these hints are insufficient. To pass from a normal nature one must cross "the deadly space between." And this is best done by indirection.Long ago an honest scholar my senior, said to me in reference to one who like himself is now no more, a man so unimpeachably respectable that against him nothing was ever openly said tho' among the few something was whispered, "Yes X— is a nut not to be cracked by the tap of a lady's fan. " You are aware that I am the adherent of no organized religion much less of any philosophy built into a systim. Well, for all that I think that to try and get into X—, enter his labyrinth and get out again, without a clue derived from some source other than what is known as knowledge of the world — that were hardly possible, at least for me. ""Why" said I, "X— however singular a study to some, is yet human, and knowledge of the world assuredly implies the knowledge of human nature, and in most of its varieties." "Yes, but a superficial knowledge of it, serving ordinary purposes. But for anything deeper, I am not certain whether to know the world and to know human nature be not two distinct branches of knowledge, which while they may coexist in the same heart, yet either may exist with little or nothing of the other. Nay, in an average man of the world, his constant rubbing with it bluntsthat finer spiritual insight indispensable to the understanding of the essential in certain exceptional characters, whether evel ones or good. In a matter of some importance I have seen a girl wind an old lawyer about her little finger. Nor was it the dotage of senile love. Nothing of the sort. But he knew law better than he knew the girl's heart. Coke and Blackstone hardly shed so much light into obscure spiritual places as the Hebrew prophets. And who were they? Mostly recluses." At the time my inexperience was such that I did not quite see the drift of all this. It may be that I see it now. And, indeed, if that lexicon whichis based on Holy Writ were any longer popular, one might with less difficulty define and denominate certain phenomenal men. As it is, one must turn to some authority not liable to the charge of being tinctured with the Biblical element. In a list of definitions included in the authentic translation of Plato, a list attributed to him, occurs this: "Natural Depravity: a depravity according to nature." A definition which tho' savoring of Calvinism, by no means involvesCalvin's dogma as to total mankind. Evidently its intent makes it applicable but to individuals. Not many are the examples of this depravity which the gallows and jail supply. At any rate for notable instances, since these have no vulgar alloy of the brute in them, but invariably are dominated by intellectuality, one must go elsewhere. Civilization, especially if of the austerer sort, is auspicious to it. It folds itself in the mantle of respectability. It has its certain negative virtues serving as silent auxiliaries. It never allows wine to get within in its guard.It is not going too far to say that it is without vices or small sins. There is a phenomenal pride in it that excludes them from anything . Never mercenary or avaricious In short the depravity here meant partakes nothing of the sordid or sensual. It is serious, but free from acerbity. Though no flatterer of mankind it never speaks ill of But the thing which in eminent instances signalizes so exceptional a nature is this: Though the man's even temper and discreet bearing would seem to intimate a mind peculiarly subject to the lawof reason, not the less in heart he would seem to riot in complete exemption from that law having apparently little to do with reason further than to employ it as an ambidexter implement for effecting the irrational. That is to say: Toward the accomplishment of an aim which in wantonness of malignity would seem to partake of the insane, he will direct a cool judgement sagacious and sound. Such men are madmen, secretive ones their lunacynot continuous & persisting but occasional, and special in the outward proceding not to be distinguished from their sanity . madmen, and of the most dangerous sort, for their lunacy is not continuous, evoked by some special object; it is protectively secretive, which is as much to say it is , so that when moreover, most active it is to the average mind not distinguishable from sanity, and for the reason above suggested that whatever its aims may be, and the aim never declared— the method the outward proceding are is always perfectly rational. Now Something such an one was Claggart in whom was the mania of an evil nature, not engendered by vicious training or corrupting books or licentious living, but born with him and innate, in short "a depravity according to nature." Dark sayings are these, some will say. But why? Is it because they somewhat savor of of Holy Writ in its phrase "mystery of iniquity"? If they do, such savor was far enough from being intended for little will it commend these pages to many a reader of to-day. The point of the present story turning on the hidden nature of the Master at Arms has necessitated chapter . With an added hint or two the resumed narrative must be left to ^ vindicate, as it may, its own credibility.